With the option that you indicate to me, the offset in the metadata is still changed. These are the original metadata:
And these after calculating the normals:
Search found 16 matches
- Sat Oct 19, 2024 8:16 am
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: Using the option "-KEEP_ORIG_FIXED" in the commandline
- Replies: 5
- Views: 754
- Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:13 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: Using the option "-KEEP_ORIG_FIXED" in the commandline
- Replies: 5
- Views: 754
Re: Using the option "-KEEP_ORIG_FIXED" in the commandline
According to the documentation, you still have to set the x, y and z coordinates of the custom shift (between -SET_GLOBAL_SHIFT and -KEEP_ORIG_FIXED). This reply indicates that the function does not behave as I intended. My goal is to preserve the offset of the original file in the resulting file, ...
- Wed Oct 16, 2024 1:09 pm
- Forum: Issues, bugs, etc.
- Topic: Using the option "-KEEP_ORIG_FIXED" in the commandline
- Replies: 5
- Views: 754
Using the option "-KEEP_ORIG_FIXED" in the commandline
Hi! I am trying to use the “-KEEP_ORIG_FIXED” option with the version v2.14.alpha (OCt 14 2024) , using the following line of code: CloudCompare -SILENT -C_EXPORT_FMT LAS -AUTO_SAVE OFF -O PNOA_2023_EXT_274-4420_NPC00.laz -OCTREE_NORMALS 1 -NORMALS_TO_SFS -SET_GLOBAL_SHIFT -KEEP_ORIG_FIXED -SAVE_CLO...
- Mon Sep 23, 2024 4:23 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Open and export LAZ with BATCH not working
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2895
Re: Open and export LAZ with BATCH not working
With which version? My apologies for the late reply. I have tested with the versions 2.12.0, 2.12.4 (Kyiv) and 2.13.2 (Kharkiv), finding the same issue with this code: for %%F in ("%DIRECTORIO%\*.laz") do ( set "ARCHIVO=%%~nF" CloudCompare -SILENT -C_EXPORT_FMT LAZ -AUTO_SAVE OF...
- Mon Sep 02, 2024 3:52 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Open and export LAZ with BATCH not working
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2895
Re: Open and export LAZ with BATCH not working
I rescued this post because I'm finding the same error with windows. I am not able to export a .laz point cloud using the command line.
- Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:40 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Calculation of verticality
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1880
Re: Calculation of verticality
I found a bit more info in the paper "STREAMED VERTICAL RECTANGLE DETECTION IN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANS FOR FACADE DATABASE PRODUCTION": Captura.PNG But I still don't understand exactly how to create the tensor, can anyone tell me how to create it from the coordinates of the points that mak...
- Tue Sep 06, 2022 9:45 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Calculation of verticality
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1880
Calculation of verticality
Hi! I am using CloudCompare's "Compute geometric features" tool, and a question has arisen. According to the documentation (paper "Contour detection in unstructured 3D point clouds") the variable "Verticality" is defined as: 1 − |<[0 0 1], e3>| I'm a bit lost and I don'...
- Thu Jan 20, 2022 2:52 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Numerical scale
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2061
Re: Numerical scale
Hi Daniel! Thanks for the fast reply. Could be possible to explain how it works the "Adjust zoom" tool? I mean, could be possible to explain me how is possible to set up a scale of 1/10 (1 cm in the screen is equivalent to 1 cm in the reality)? Sorry if the question is too obvius.
- Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:00 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Numerical scale
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2061
Numerical scale
Hi All! Could you let me know if there is a way to know the numerical scale of a view?
Perhaps it would be positive to give the user the option to select a numerical scale in the view (1/50, 1/10,000...) as GIS do, and not just visualise a graphical scale.
Thanks!
Perhaps it would be positive to give the user the option to select a numerical scale in the view (1/50, 1/10,000...) as GIS do, and not just visualise a graphical scale.
Thanks!
- Wed Oct 06, 2021 6:33 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Obtaining the eigenvalues of the point cloud
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3077
Re: Obtaining the eigenvalues of the point cloud
Hi Daniel! Yes, I applied the global shift in CC. I tried again the same code but using the shifted coordinates and the result is the same. Could be possible to obtain an intermediate result from CC as the covariance matrix?