Re: Issues w/M3C2
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 8:59 pm
It really depends on your data (its density, etc.), and of course of the scale of the 'features' you are monitoring.
In your specific case, I would say a scale of 0.05 and a max depth of 0.5 (i.e. something bigger than the box ;). For the normals, I would compute them before hand (with the 'Normals > Compute' tool).
EDIT: you can get very clean normals by using 0.05 as the 'kernel' for normals computation, and -X as preferred direction.
In your specific case, I would say a scale of 0.05 and a max depth of 0.5 (i.e. something bigger than the box ;). For the normals, I would compute them before hand (with the 'Normals > Compute' tool).
EDIT: you can get very clean normals by using 0.05 as the 'kernel' for normals computation, and -X as preferred direction.